Strengthening research ethics governance and regulatory oversight in Central America and the Dominican Republic in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Good governance and regulatory supervision are required to conduct research in an international public health emergency context and to ensure compliance with ethical standards. The "Strengthening research ethics governance and regulatory oversight in Central America and the Dominican Republic in response to the COVID-19 pandemic" study is a regional effort in which research ethics stakeholders participated in addressing research ethics governance and preparedness response challenges to the COVID-19 pandemic in Central America and the Dominican Republic. METHODS: A qualitative action research study was conducted following a participatory approach. Research ethics stakeholders in Central America and the Dominican Republic were mapped; a regional webinar and three virtual workshops were conducted discussing research ethics governance, ethics review and collaborative research practice during the pandemic. A roundtable session presented results and obtained feedback on a draft of a policy to strengthen regional research ethics governance. RESULTS: Countries across Central America and the Dominican Republic are at different stages in their development of research ethics systems. Countries with more established systems before COVID-19 were better organized and prepared to respond. This finding argues against improvisation and supports further work on strengthening governance of research ethics systems. Community engagement in research ethics public policy-making is practically absent in the region. Research and research ethics collaboration schemes are lacking amongst the countries; however, there are incipient initiatives in the region, such as the Central America and Caribbean Network of Research Ethics Committees. A policy brief with recommendations on how to advance towards strengthening the governance of research ethics systems was prepared and submitted to the Central American Integration System for analysis and possible approval. CONCLUSION: National research ethics systems in Central America and the Dominican Republic were unprepared to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic with respect to research oversight and effective collaboration. In most cases, national research ethics systems were found to be weak, and regional research collaboration was practically absent. To promote collaboration, a joint strategy needs to be developed with a regional vision towards sharing knowledge and best practices.

COVID-19 en América Latina y Caribe: determinación de prioridadesen investigación y llamado a la acción / COVID-19 in Latin America and Caribbean: a determination of research priorities and call to action

Antecedentes: La Red de Salud Global estableció, en enero 2020, una comunidad de práctica para abordar la investigación en COVID-19 en países de ingresos bajos/medios. Objetivo: Identificar prioridades en investigación sobre COVID-19 que requieren atención urgente en América Latina y el Caribe (LAC) y establecer una comunidad de práctica abierta local para apoyar su implementación. Métodos: Estudio exploratorio mixto. Se analizaron los resultados específicos para LAC de una encuesta en línea (enfoque cuantitativo) que evaluó si la agenda prioritaria de investigación para COVID-19 de la OMS sigue siendo pertinente solicitando a los participantes que clasificaran sus tres principales prioridades a corto y largo plazo. Asimismo, se organizó un taller virtual abierto (enfoque cualitativo) el cual fue grabado. Se realizó un análisis temático pragmático a partir de las presentaciones de los panelistas y de las preguntas y comentarios de la audiencia. Se generó un marco de codificación mediante enfoques inductivo y luego deductivo siguiendo la agenda OMS. Resultados: Se contó con 223 participantes de 22 países. Se identificó un consenso sobre los temas de investigación e innovación prioritarios para LAC, dentro y fuera del marco de la agenda OMS, siendo una gran prioridad la necesidad de estudios de ciencias sociales para ayudar a los científicos biomédicos. Discusión: Dado que los casos siguen aumentando en LAC, consideramos que nuestros hallazgos son útiles para orientar tanto a las redes de investigación en la planificación de estudios como a los financiadores en sus decisiones para la asignación de recursos para investigación e innovación...(AU)

The remaining unknowns: a mixed methods study of the current and global health research priorities for COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: In March 2020, the WHO released a Global Research Roadmap in an effort to coordinate and accelerate the global research response to combat COVID-19 based on deliberations of 400 experts across the world. Three months on, the disease and our understanding have both evolved significantly. As we now tackle a pandemic in very different contexts and with increased knowledge, we sought to build on the work of the WHO to gain a more current and global perspective on these initial priorities. METHODS: We undertook a mixed methods study seeking the views of the global research community to (1) assess which of the early WHO roadmap priorities are still most pressing; (2) understand whether they are still valid in different settings, regions or countries; and (3) identify any new emerging priorities. RESULTS: Thematic analysis of the significant body of combined data shows the WHO roadmap is globally relevant; however, new important priorities have emerged, in particular, pertinent to low and lower middle-income countries (less resourced countries), where health systems are under significant competing pressures. We also found a shift from prioritising vaccine and therapeutic development towards a focus on assessing the effectiveness, risks, benefits and trust in the variety of public health interventions and measures. Our findings also provide insight into temporal nature of these research priorities, highlighting the urgency of research that can only be undertaken within the period of virus transmission, as well as other important research questions but which can be answered outside the transmission period. Both types of studies are key to help combat this pandemic but also importantly to ensure we are better prepared for the future. CONCLUSION: We hope these findings will help guide decision-making across the broad research system including the multilateral partners, research funders, public health practitioners, clinicians and civil society.